Monday, January 17, 2022

 

Where We Stand and Who We Stand With (I know….a “generalization”)

                              On one side


Government and bureaucracy


State intelligence and law-enforcement agencies


Establishment/legacy news media


Powerful social media/tech monopolies


“Education” drones and propagandists / academia.


Entertainment personalities and entertainment corporations


Big unions


NGOs and globalist institutions (the World Economic Forum)


Collectivist authoritarian ideologies spanning the spectrum from Nazis to communists.


Laws manipulated to serve the partisan goals of the moment


Those who wish to upset societal traditions and stability.


Ragtag violent agitators and criminal elements


Those who prioritize the interests of far-away abstractions (“the world,” the “community,” the “people”)


Those who wish to impose unfamiliar standards of culture on others in the name of a concocted “diversity”


Those who wish to radically disrupt the family unit and what children are exposed to


Elitist milquetoast suburban busy bodies who want to rule others’ lives.


Those who are dishonest with themselves and others regarding who they are and what values they hold (fascists calling others “fascists!”) 


Those unable to acknowledge their own flaws and self-interests 


Rules for thee but not for me


Those who openly advocate for a powerful soulless apparatus of state to drain resources and stifle creativity and innovation


Those who believe that equity trumps freedom.


                                         *****************


                                  On the other side:  


Common citizens with little interest in political issues


Working class people in manufacturing and service industries


Farmers


Religious people and those who don’t care about religion (as opposed to those who are openly hostile to a nation’s dominant religion)


Those who believe in traditional standards of lifestyle and allegiance to family, friends, and close members of the immediate community (people they can actually see and converse with)


Laws long established, grounded in common sense, and applied equally and fairly


Those who admit to preferring cultural standards and customs they are familiar with while not wishing to meddle in the choices of others.


Citizens and leaders who appreciate and prefer the history and attributes of the country they were born and raised in (“patriotism”)


Those who are honest with themselves and others regarding their hopes, dreams, and values (having no problem admitting that they want the best for themselves and their families)


Those who simply wish to be left alone


Those who are skeptical of government authority and suspicious of those who promote more laws over the lives of others


Those who marvel at the achievements of others and take joy in utilizing innovations and technological development


Those who believe that freedom trumps equity.


                                *********************


Those allied with the first side noted can loosely be seen as adherents to a leftist worldview (authoritarian collectivism), a value system that always produces a society in disarray, ending in a drab, cruel, and lifeless condition for those who succumb to its dictates. The latter, which can be loosely called classical liberalism or “conservatism,” inevitably produces a dynamic and prosperous society that is diverse in spirit and condition, and honors the free will and actions of others.


One side offers a road to human progress and a template for the pursuit of happiness. The other, a road to hell.



Comments: Post a Comment



<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?